CHRYSLER Concorde Review

The Chrysler Concorde debuted in 1993 as a successor to the Chrysler Fifth Avenue, offering a modern aesthetic and advanced engineering that emphasized interior space and comfort. It was part of Chrysler’s LH platform, sharing many components with the Eagle Vision and Dodge Intrepid.

• Key Dates:
  • 1993: Concorde launched as a replacement for the Fifth Avenue
  • 1998: Second-generation Concorde introduced with updated styling
  • 2004: Concorde production ceased

The second generation, introduced in 1998, brought further refinement with a more powerful engine lineup and enhanced technological features. The Concorde remained a staple in Chrysler’s lineup until it was eventually discontinued in 2004 in favor of newer models.

Technology by Model Year:

• 1993: Basic audio system, power accessories
• 1998: Introduction of premium audio and automatic climate control
• 2001: Available navigation system and upgraded infotainment options

Infotainment System:

• Screen size: 6.5-inch display (available with navigation)
• Features: AM/FM radio, cassette/CD player, premium audio
• Connectivity: Basic connectivity options, no Bluetooth

Driver Assistance Features:

• Standard: Anti-lock brakes, traction control
• Optional: Side airbags, upgraded security system

The Chrysler Concorde received favorable safety ratings for its time, with structural integrity and a suite of safety features that provided peace of mind.

Safety Ratings:

• NHTSA Rating: 4 stars
• IIHS Rating: Acceptable

Safety Features:

• Standard: Dual front airbags, anti-lock brakes
• Optional: Side airbags, traction control system

Running costs for the Chrysler Concorde were moderate, with fuel economy typical of its class and manageable maintenance expenses.

• Fuel Economy: 19/27/22 mpg (city/highway/combined)
• Service Intervals:
  • Oil Change: Every 7,500 miles
  • Major Service: Every 30,000 miles
• Common Repair Costs:
  • Transmission Repair: $1,200-$2,500
  • Brake Replacement: $300-$600

Known Issues by Year:

• 1998: Transmission issues
• 2001: Electrical problems

Competitor 1: Ford Taurus

• Market Position: The Ford Taurus was a direct competitor, offering similar interior space and price.
• Features Comparison: The Taurus featured more advanced safety features and a more modern design in later models.
• Price Comparison: Generally priced similarly, with the Taurus sometimes offering better value in the used market.
• Running Costs: Comparable, with the Taurus occasionally having lower maintenance costs.

Competitor 2: Chevrolet Impala

• Market Position: The Impala was another strong contender in the full-size sedan market.
• Features Comparison: The Impala offered more powerful engine options, but the Concorde had a more spacious interior.
• Price Comparison: The Impala often had a higher resale value.
• Running Costs: The Impala's V6 options resulted in slightly higher fuel costs.

Competitor 3: Toyota Avalon

• Market Position: The Avalon was positioned as a more upscale alternative, focusing on luxury and refinement.
• Features Comparison: The Avalon offered superior build quality and more luxury features.
• Price Comparison: The Avalon was typically more expensive, both new and used.
• Running Costs: Higher initial costs but more reliable, leading to potentially lower long-term expenses.

The Chrysler Concorde was a solid choice in the full-size sedan category, offering a combination of comfort, space, and value for money. While it may lack the cutting-edge technology and luxury features of some competitors, its roomy interior and smooth ride make it a worthwhile consideration for those prioritizing practicality over performance.