LEXUS CT Review

The Lexus CT has been part of the Japanese automaker's lineup since 2011, marking the brand's first venture into the compact luxury hybrid market. It was introduced as a way to offer Lexus's renowned luxury and reliability in a more environmentally friendly package.

• Key Dates:
  • 2010: Lexus CT unveiled at the Geneva Motor Show.
  • 2011: Official production begins and sales start globally.
  • 2014: Facelift introduced with updated styling and technology.
  • 2017: Final major update with new safety features.
  • 2021: Model discontinued in certain markets as focus shifts to SUVs.

Technology by Model Year:

• 2011: Introduction of Lexus Enform infotainment system
• 2014: Addition of a rearview camera and updated multimedia
• 2017: Inclusion of Lexus Safety System+ suite

Infotainment System:

• Screen size: 7-inch display
• Features: Navigation, voice command, Bluetooth
• Connectivity: USB, AUX, Bluetooth

Driver Assistance Features:

• Standard: Pre-collision system, lane departure alert, adaptive cruise control
• Optional: Blind spot monitor, rear cross-traffic alert

The Lexus CT has consistently performed well in safety tests, reflecting the brand's commitment to ensuring occupant protection. It offers a robust suite of safety features as standard, which enhances its appeal to safety-conscious buyers.

Safety Ratings:

• NHTSA Rating: 5 stars
• IIHS Rating: Good

Safety Features:

• Standard: 8 airbags, pre-collision system, adaptive cruise control
• Optional: Parking sensors, blind spot monitoring

The running costs of the Lexus CT are relatively low, particularly for a luxury vehicle, thanks to its hybrid technology. Its maintenance schedule is straightforward, and the hybrid system has proven to be reliable over time.

• Fuel Economy: 43/40/42 mpg (city/highway/combined)
• Service Intervals:
  • Oil Change: 10,000 miles
  • Major Service: 60,000 miles
• Common Repair Costs:
  • Brake pads: $150-$300
  • Battery replacement: $1,000-$2,000

Known Issues by Year:

• 2011: Minor infotainment glitches
• 2014: Occasional hybrid system calibration issues

Competitor 1: Audi A3 e-tron

• Market Position: The Audi A3 e-tron offers a plug-in hybrid alternative with a focus on performance and luxury.
• Features Comparison: Audi provides a more dynamic driving experience with a sportier setup and advanced tech features.
• Price Comparison: Generally priced higher than the CT, reflecting its premium branding and additional performance capabilities.
• Running Costs: Slightly higher due to more expensive parts and maintenance, but offers better plug-in hybrid fuel savings.

Competitor 2: BMW i3

• Market Position: As an electric vehicle, the BMW i3 targets eco-conscious buyers with a different energy proposition.
• Features Comparison: The i3 has a futuristic design and offers a distinct set of features related to its electric powertrain.
• Price Comparison: Initially more expensive, but potential savings in fuel and incentives can offset this over time.
• Running Costs: Significantly lower running costs due to its electric nature, though battery replacements can be costly.

Competitor 3: Mercedes-Benz A-Class

• Market Position: The A-Class is a strong contender in the luxury compact segment with a focus on tech and comfort.
• Features Comparison: Boasts a more advanced infotainment system and a wider array of luxury features.
• Price Comparison: Generally comparable, but can become more expensive with option packages.
• Running Costs: Comparable, though the A-Class relies more on traditional fuel.

The Lexus CT is an appealing choice for those seeking an entry-level luxury hybrid that emphasizes efficiency and comfort. Its conservative styling may not turn heads, but it compensates with a high-quality interior and a solid array of standard features. While not the most thrilling to drive, its reliability and low running costs make it a practical choice for the discerning eco-conscious buyer.